Amber Heard cannot pay Johnny Depp $8.35 million in damages, her attorney says.  what happened after that?

Amber Heard cannot pay Johnny Depp $8.35 million in damages, her attorney says. what happened after that?

After a jury decided Amber Heard was guilty of defaming Johnny Depp in her Washington Post In an opinion piece about being a victim of domestic violence, she was ordered to pay millions of dollars in damages to her ex-husband.

Shortly after the trial ended, Ms. Heard’s lawyer appeared on morning talk shows to say that her client would not be able to pay $8.35 million in damages to thePirates of the Caribbean star.

“Oh no today Show if her client can pay the huge amount to Mr. Depp.

Mr. Depp won his defamation lawsuit against his ex-wife on all three counts. He received $10 million in compensatory fees, relating to lost career opportunities, and $5 million in punitive damages. Judge Benny Azcaret later reduced the punitive damages to $350,000, the maximum allowed in Virginia, where the trial took place.

For her part, Ms. Heard received $2 million in compensation for one of her three counterclaims. It left her owed a total of $8.35 million to Depp.

While Ms. Heard’s financial status is unclear, Bridehoft revealed during closing arguments for the trial that her client had collected more than $6 million in legal costs alone.

In 2016, she is 36 years old sHe received $7 million in a settlement from Depp when the couple separated. She had previously said the money was meant to be divided equally as donations to the ACLU and Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.

However, during the high-stakes trial, it was revealed in video evidence provided by Depp’s lawyers that Heard had not yet fulfilled that promise. The actress said, while being questioned, that she “fully intends” to honor her pledge.

“I would like him to stop suing me until I can,” Ms Heard told Fairfax District Court.

It was revealed in court testimony that Ms. Heard’s acting career had been hampered by a high-profile defamation caseAnd the NEWSWEEK mentioned.

Combined with Bredehoft’s comments to the interviewer after the sentencing, it has led to speculation about whether Ms Heard will be able to foot the bill for the heavy damages and, if she can’t, what her legal avenue might be.

Although she did not address any financial stress in her post-trial statement, Ms Heard acknowledged a deep “heartbreak” for the jury’s decision.

“The disappointment I feel today is beyond words,” Ms Heard wrote. “I am saddened that the mountain of evidence is still not enough to stand up to the unequal power, influence and control of my ex-husband.”

The potential paths Ms Heard could take to avoid paying millions of dollars are not straightforward, and could result in more legal fees, according to the CBS.

Appealing the ruling is one way Heard can try to avoid paying $8.35 million. Her lawyer saidtoday Turns out her legal team is pursuing that option.

“Sure,” Ms Bredehoft said of the appeal issue. “And she has excellent reasons for that.”

If Ms Heard goes this route, she may still be required to pay a guarantee of damages — plus interest — as the appeal makes its way through the court, according to the MoneyWatch from CBS.

If Ms. Heard decides not to pursue the appeal, and is still unable to pay the damages, it could result in withholding of pay – which allows the judge to cut a certain amount of earnings or paychecks, and forward it to a creditor.

Under Virginia law, Mr. Depp would need a court ruling before the foreclosure could be enforced. The measure has limits with rules that vary by state. In Virginia, “a creditor can take back less than 25 percent of your spendable earnings, or the amount by which your available earnings exceed 40 times the federal minimum wage,” according to legal website Nolo.com.

The third option is to file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy but this path is also uncertain.

Bruce Markle, professor of bankruptcy law at Northwestern Pritzker School of Law, said: Law and crime That because of the nature of Ms. Heard’s case, she could not be excused from her payments by filing for bankruptcy. Defamation is considered to be intentional harm, meaning that the misconduct was carried out intentionally or voluntarily.

“What separates the Heard case from normal tort cases is the discovery of intent,” he told the news outlet. “Bankruptcy law does not allow release of most intentional harm (battering, assault, etc.). Defamation applies due to the desired consequences of malice or intent to harm another person.”

Mrs. Heard’s possible final adjournment is one over which she has no control: it must be initiated by Mr. Depp.

The representative can decide to waive the monetary damages or if Ms. Heard decides to file an appeal, drop the amount in the negotiations.

It is not clear whether either side will go this route. However, in a statement issued after the ruling, Mr. Deeb asserted that his “goal” in filing the defamation lawsuit was “to reveal the truth, regardless of the outcome”.

“Telling the truth was something I owe to my children and to all those who have remained steadfast in their support of me,” he wrote on Instagram.

“I feel so at peace knowing that I’ve finally made it happen.”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published.